From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 1906
116 App. Div. 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

December 7, 1906.

Isaac N. Jacobson, for the appellant.

John J. Linson and Albert J. Graeffe, for the respondent.


By section 1773 of the Code of Civil Procedure this proceeding for contempt is specifically authorized in enforcement of a judgment directing the payment of alimony. The case is, therefore, taken out of the rule as to actions generally prescribed by section 1241 of the Code. This section, 1773, was first inserted in our law in 1880, when the second part of the Code of Civil Procedure took effect. (See Laws of 1880, chap. 178.) When the case of Park v. Park ( 80 N.Y. 156) arose, therefore, there was no such specific provision of law applicable to these actions. The case of Mercer v. Mercer (73 Hun, 192), relied upon by defendant, arose upon an order directing payment of counsel fee and not of alimony.

A certified copy of the decree was properly served upon the defendant and a personal demand for the alimony. The delay in making the demand is shown to have been caused by the absence of defendant from the State. That the rights of plaintiff have been impaired and defeated by defendant's failure to pay the same is undoubted, and we discover no reason for interfering with the order of the Special Term.

All concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Stanley v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 1906
116 App. Div. 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Stanley v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:SARAH TAYLOR STANLEY. Respondent, v . JAMES WILLIAM STANLEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1906

Citations

116 App. Div. 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
101 N.Y.S. 725

Citing Cases

Wides v. Wides

itiated against a recalcitrant judgment debtor absent a violation or impairment of legal process issued under…

Stewart v. Stewart

ecree with respect to the payment of alimony. If the Legislature intended to authorize the institution of the…