From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanciel v. Holinka

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 31, 2008
Civil No. 06-3730 (PJS/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 31, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-3730 (PJS/SRN).

January 31, 2008


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated January 7, 2008. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED; and

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Stanciel v. Holinka

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 31, 2008
Civil No. 06-3730 (PJS/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Stanciel v. Holinka

Case Details

Full title:SAM STANCIEL, Petitioner, v. CAROL HOLINKA, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jan 31, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 06-3730 (PJS/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Rardin

“As several courts have noted, the RDAP has proved popular with prisoners because, beyond its rehabilitative…