granting a motion to alter or amend some language of a judgment which movants contended was too general and not in conformance with Rule 65(d)
Summary of this case from United States v. Kasz Enterprises, Inc.No. 89-1045.
May 17, 1989.
D.Ct./E.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED
granting a motion to alter or amend some language of a judgment which movants contended was too general and not in conformance with Rule 65(d)
Summary of this case from United States v. Kasz Enterprises, Inc.Full title:Stambler v. Diebold, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Date published: May 17, 1989
However, that conduct was part of the fraud proved at trial and conduct of that sort has been found to be…
United States v. Kasz Enterprises, Inc.A motion under this subdivision (b) does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation. . .…