Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv19, (Maxwell).
June 26, 2008
ORDER
On November 2, 2007, Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert filed his Report and Recommendation in the above-styled matter wherein the parties were directed, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), to file with the Clerk of Court any written objections within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed her objections on November 12, 2007.
Upon examination of the report from the Magistrate Judge, it appears to the Court that the issues raised in the parties' cross Motions for Summary Judgment were thoroughly considered by Magistrate Judge Seibert in his Report and Recommendation. The Court, upon an independent de novo consideration of all matters now before it, is of the opinion that the proposed Report and Recommendation accurately reflects the law applicable to the facts and circumstances before the Court in this action. Moreover, the Plaintiff's objections have not raised any issues that were not thoroughly considered by the Magistrate Judge in his Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Seibert's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, accepted in whole and that this civil action be disposed of in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, d
1. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED;
2. The Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;
3. The decision for the Defendant is AFFIRMED; and
4. This civil action is DISMISSED and RETIRED from the docket of this Court.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a separate judgment order and to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.