From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Paul F. M. Ins. Co. v. Phoenix Assur. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1932
236 App. Div. 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

October 5, 1932.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Niagara County.

Carleton J. Townsend, for the appellant.

Hugh McM. Russ, for the respondent.


The action is brought upon defendant's written policy — not upon a claimed oral contract or a "binder" contract. The policy was not countersigned by the duly authorized agent at Niagara Falls until the day after the fire. Since the policy provides that it shall not be valid until thus countersigned no contract binding the defendant ever went into effect for the reason that the policy was neither made a complete contract nor delivered until after the fire. The delivery of the policy by defendant's agent, the Niagara Falls Fire Office, cannot be held to have created a waiver by defendant of any claim based upon the absence of a counter-signature, since no information or knowledge as to the fire was in the possession of defendant or its agent until after delivery of the policy.

All concur, SEARS, P.J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

St. Paul F. M. Ins. Co. v. Phoenix Assur. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1932
236 App. Div. 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

St. Paul F. M. Ins. Co. v. Phoenix Assur. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PHOENIX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
259 N.Y.S. 931

Citing Cases

TAGGERT v. SECURITY INS. CO. OF NEW HAVEN, CONN

Plaintiff's affidavits show, at most, that the policy may have been printed, with the facsimile signatures of…