From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Louis, I. M. S. Ry. Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 20, 1909
104 P. 1092 (Okla. 1909)

Opinion

No. 782

Opinion Filed October 20, 1909.

RAILROAD RATES — Regulation by Corporation Commission. Syllabus same as in Midland Valley R. Co. et al. v. State, No. 736 decided at this term, ante, p. 817. 104 P. 1086.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from Corporation Commission.

Action by the State against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company and others. From an order fixing the freight rates, the St. Louis, Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company and others appeal. Remanded, with directions.

On the 20th day of January, A.D. 1908, this proceeding was begun by the Corporation Commission against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company, the St. Louis San Francisco Railroad Company, the Midland Valley Railroad Company, the Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Company, the Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Company, the Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Company, the Chicago, Rock Island Pacific Railway Company, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, the Ft. Smith Western Railway Company, the Kansas City, Mexico Orient Railway Company, the Oklahoma Central Rail road Company, and Asa E. Ramsey as receiver thereof, and the Missouri, Oklahoma Gulf Railway Company, by causing to be published in the Guthrie Leader, a daily paper published in Guthrie, Logan county, Okla., a notice of the proposed order No. 8, and afterwards, on the 16th day of May, A.D. 1908, pursuant to such notice, which was in due form and published as required by law, hearing was had thereon, and final order No. 45, fixing intrastate rates on hay, grain, grain products, and such commodities, was made and entered. Thereafter, on the 15th day of March, A.D. 1909, the appellants, said railway companies, presented to the chairman of the Corporation Commission their request in writing for certification of all evidence heard in such case, and the facts and reasons upon which said final order was based, which was denied, On the 16th day of March, A.D. 1909, said appellants made application to this court for writ of mandamus requiring such certification, which was granted and complied with on the 7th day of April, A.D. 1909. Thereafter, on the 11th day of September, A.D. 1909, the counsel for the appellee moved to dismiss this appeal for the reasons: (1) That the same was neither taken nor application made for the certification within due time. (2) That the record fails to contain a finding of fact, although the certificate recites that such finding of facts as made by the commission was not made of record, and could not be transmitted. (3) That it was the duty of the appellants to take steps to preserve the record, in the event they desired to appeal.

S. T. Bledsoe, C. O. Blake, Clifford L. Jackson, and Edgar A. De Meules, for appellants.

Geo. A. Henshaw, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The case of the Midland Valley Railroad Co. et al., Appellants, v. State of Oklahoma, Appellee, decided at this term of court, ante, p. 817, 104 P. 1086, is decisive of this case, both as to law and fact.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is accordingly overruled, and the case remanded, with the same instruction.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

St. Louis, I. M. S. Ry. Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 20, 1909
104 P. 1092 (Okla. 1909)
Case details for

St. Louis, I. M. S. Ry. Co. v. State

Case Details

Full title:ST. LOUIS, I. M. S. RY. CO. et al. v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 20, 1909

Citations

104 P. 1092 (Okla. 1909)
104 P. 1092

Citing Cases

In re Intrastate Express Rates

Therefore these cases cannot be considered as in point for such contention. As to Midland Valley R. Co. v.…