From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Joe Paper Company v. Mickler

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 28, 1971
252 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1971)

Opinion

No. 40490.

July 21, 1971. Rehearing Denied September 28, 1971.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, First District.

William L. Durden and Fred H. Kent, Jr., of Kent, Durden Kent, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Willard Howatt, St. Augustine, and Delbridge L. Gibbs, of Marks, Gray, Conroy Gibbs, Jacksonville, for respondents other than Harold M. Wayne.

Harold M. Wayne, in pro. per.

Benjamin K. Phipps, Tallahassee, for the Tax Assessors Association of Florida, amicus curiae.

John E. Norris, of Brannon, Brown, Norris, Vocelle Haley, Lake City, for Florida Forestry Association, Inc., amicus curiae.

Edward J. McCarthy, Jr., Jacksonville, for Container Corp. of America, amicus curiae.


The decision under review is quashed and the cause remanded under the authority of Conrad v. Sapp, filed July 14, 1971, 252 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1971) and for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the District Court, 241 So.2d 415, with directions to enter a judgment extending "agricultural zoning" to the land involved.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents with opinion.


I respectfully dissent on authority of Greenwood v. Oates, 251 So.2d 665 (Fla. 1971), and Conrad v. Sapp, 252 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1971). We there established that in cases of disputed facts the granting or denying of the beneficial "agricultural" classification by the taxing authorities, and any court review thereof, are to be based upon the particular facts of each case under applicable standards (criteria); that the determination arrives in this Court with a presumption of correctness (under this well-established rule); and that the decision will be affirmed if supported by competent, substantial evidence. This case is supported by competent, substantial evidence, as were Greenwood and Sapp. It should be affirmed.

Accordingly, I would uphold the discretion here exercised by the Agricultural Zoning Board, by the able Circuit Judge and then by the First District Court of Appeal in denying the agricultural zoning which petitioner sought.


Summaries of

St. Joe Paper Company v. Mickler

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 28, 1971
252 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1971)
Case details for

St. Joe Paper Company v. Mickler

Case Details

Full title:ST. JOE PAPER COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. DAN F…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 28, 1971

Citations

252 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1971)

Citing Cases

Schooley v. Wetstone

The contention by appellants that the primary use of the lands is for speculative purposes is of no…

McKinney v. Hunt

On his 20-acre parcel of land is located his dwelling and curtilage, a kitchen garden, and two or three cows…