Opinion
May 27, 1977
Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court.
Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Goldman, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner was formerly a patrolman in the Buffalo Police Department. He was convicted of the misdemeanor of conspiracy in 1969 and removed from office by order of the Commissioner of Police on the day of the conviction (see Public Officers Law, § 30, subd 1, par e). His conviction was reversed on appeal and the indictment was dismissed (see People v Sroka, 32 A.D.2d 463). He thereafter brought this petition seeking reinstatement and back pay. Section 30 (subd 1, par e) of the Public Officers Law provides that an office shall be vacant upon the incumbent's conviction of a felony or a crime involving a violation of the oath of office. Petitioner contends that conspiracy to commit bribery and grand larceny (the charges involved in his conviction) is not a crime involving a violation of his oath of office as a policeman. We disagree. Conspiracy to bribe is no less a violation of the oath of office than the acceptance or giving of the bribe itself, and the crime of which petitioner was convicted falls within the terms of the statute. Upon petitioner's conviction his office was vacated immediately by operation of law, not as a matter of punishment to him, but because the term of office was limited by statute and terminated upon the happening of the event (Matter of Obergfell, 239 N.Y. 48; and, see, Hendon v Board of Educ., 281 N.Y. 757). The subsequent reversal of the conviction and dismissal of the indictment may have removed petitioner's disability to hold office but it could not entitle him to reinstatement with back pay. Petitioner alleges that the removal is unconstitutional. As noted, petitioner was not removed from office; his term expired. The Legislature may fix the terms of office when no contrary provision is made in the constitution (NY Const, Art XIII, § 6), and it has done so by the Public Officers Law. The provision is constitutional (see Hendon v Board of Educ., supra).