From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Srmof 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 14, 2014
8 N.E.3d 962 (Ohio 2014)

Opinion

NO. 2014-0485

2014-05-14

SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis



MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS


Butler App. Nos. CA2012–11–239 and CA2013–05–068, 2014-Ohio-71. On review of order certifying a conflict, the court determines that a conflict exists on both issues certified. The parties are to brief issue 1 stated on pages 2–3 of the court of appeals' entry filed March 12, 2014:

“In order to establish standing in a foreclosure action and invoke the jurisdiction of the common pleas court, must the plaintiff establish at the time complaint for foreclosure is filed that it has an interest in both the note and the mortgage, or is it sufficient if the Plaintiff demonstrates an interest in either the note or the mortgage?”

The conflict case is BAC Home Loans Servicing v. McFerren, 9th Dist. Summit No. 26384, 2013-Ohio-3228.
O'Donnell, J., dissents.

Issue 2 is held for the decision in 2012–2110, CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski, 5th Dist. Stark No. 2012–CA–93, 2012-Ohio-4901; and briefing schedule stayed.


Summaries of

Srmof 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 14, 2014
8 N.E.3d 962 (Ohio 2014)
Case details for

Srmof 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 14, 2014

Citations

8 N.E.3d 962 (Ohio 2014)
138 Ohio St. 3d 1492

Citing Cases

Fannie Mae v. Hicks

This issue has been certified to the Ohio Supreme Court for resolution. See SRMOF 2009–1 Trust v. Lewis, 138…

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. George

E.g., CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Patterson, 8th Dist., 2012-Ohio-5894, 984 N.E.2d 392, ¶ 21. The issue had been…