refusing supplemental damages because “awarding additional amounts for damages incurred before trial would be an improper invasion of the jury's province to determine actual damages and an inappropriate use of 35 U.S.C. § 284 to enhance inadequate compensatory damages.”
Summary of this case from NCS Multistage Inc. v. Nine Energy Serv.No. 93-1074.
December 21, 1994.
D.Ct./N.D.Cal.
Affirmed.
refusing supplemental damages because “awarding additional amounts for damages incurred before trial would be an improper invasion of the jury's province to determine actual damages and an inappropriate use of 35 U.S.C. § 284 to enhance inadequate compensatory damages.”
Summary of this case from NCS Multistage Inc. v. Nine Energy Serv.Full title:SRI Int'l v. Advanced Tech. Labs
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Date published: Dec 21, 1994
There is some support in the case law for Appthority's position. See, e.g., Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. v.…
TransPerfect Global, Inc. v. MotionPoint Corp.Id.; see also Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. v. Conagra, Inc., 869 F. Supp. 656, 668 (W.D. Wis. 1994) ("The Court…