From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprovero v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 6, 1981
404 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-2504.

October 6, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Dan Satin, J.

Krongold Bass and Paul Bass, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian Sikes and Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.


The plaintiff Michael Sprovero, a general building contractor, appeals from an adverse final summary judgment entered below in a slander action wherein no special damages were claimed. The trial court concluded that the oral statements sued upon did not constitute slander per se and, as no special damages were claimed, summary judgment for the defendant was proper. We disagree and reverse.

The oral statements sued upon arose over a construction job done by the plaintiff for the defendant Betty J. Miller. These statements impute conduct and characteristics to the plaintiff which are plainly incompatible with the proper exercise of the plaintiff's business; as such, the statements constitute slander per se. Campbell v. Jacksonville Kennel Club, Inc., 66 So.2d 495, 497 (Fla. 1953); Commander v. Pedersen, 116 Fla. 148, 156 So. 337 (1934); Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott, 402 So.2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Carter v. Sterling Finance Co., 132 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961). This result is not changed by the fact that some or all of the slanderous statements may have had reference to single acts of misconduct allegedly committed by the plaintiff as, in any event, these alleged acts fairly implied the lack of qualities and skill the public is reasonably entitled to expect from persons engaged in the construction business. See e.g., Restatement 2d of Torts § 573, comment e (1977).

The final summary judgment under review is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. The reversal shall be without prejudice to the defendant to raise any free speech defenses which may be applicable in this case. See e.g., Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott, 402 So.2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (Hubbart, C.J., concurring) and authorities collected.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Sprovero v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 6, 1981
404 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Sprovero v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SPROVERO, APPELLANT, v. BETTY J. MILLER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 6, 1981

Citations

404 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Orange Lake Country Club, Inc.

Hoch, 742 So.2d at 451. An oral communication that imputes to another conduct, characteristics or a condition…

Hoch v. Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett

Here the statement about Hoch suggests that his judicial duties could be improperly influenced. This imputes…