From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 9, 1979
368 So. 2d 565 (Ala. 1979)

Opinion

77-485.

March 9, 1979.

Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

T.M. Brantley and R.F. Vargo, Bay Minette, for petitioner.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Eugenia D.B. Hofammann, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, respondent.


The Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 368 So.2d 554, is quashed as improvidently granted. In quashing this writ, we note that the Court of Criminal Appeals "reviewed each and every allegation of error" and found "that the cumulative effect of these alleged errors does not demand a reversal." Thus the treatment by the Court of Criminal Appeals is consistent with the principle enunciated in Blue v. State, 246 Ala. 73, 19 So.2d 11 (1944).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 9, 1979
368 So. 2d 565 (Ala. 1979)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. State

Case Details

Full title:In re Grady SPRINKLE v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte Grady Sprinkle

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 9, 1979

Citations

368 So. 2d 565 (Ala. 1979)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. State

" We note that the right to bail is absolute and "may be denied only where the accused is charged with a…

Leonard v. State

The prosecutor can neither take unfair advantage of the defendant nor strike foul blows. Arant v. State, 232…