From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spring-Mercer Corporation v. Goodman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 28, 1926
126 Misc. 371 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)

Opinion

January 28, 1926.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

Benjamin H. Wicksel, for the appellant.

William Weintraub, for the respondents.


The nine holes cut through the were lath and plastering in the ceiling, measuring approximately twelve inches by twelve inches each, do not constitute ordinary wear and tear. The tenant is liable to the landlord for such damage to the ceiling and should make reimbursement to cover the cost of repair.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff in the sum of eighty dollars and costs.

All concur; present, GUY, WAGNER and LYDON, JJ.


Summaries of

Spring-Mercer Corporation v. Goodman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 28, 1926
126 Misc. 371 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
Case details for

Spring-Mercer Corporation v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:SPRING-MERCER CORPORATION, Appellant, v. HENRY GOODMAN and Others…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1926

Citations

126 Misc. 371 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
213 N.Y.S. 500

Citing Cases

In re Hyong Jin Kim

The measure of damages in New York State to a leasehold upon the termination of a lease is the reasonable…

Durbin-Durco, Inc. v. Blades Mfg. Corp.

" Annotation 10 A.L.R.2d 1012 "Liability of tenant for damage to the leased property due to his acts or…