From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spindel v. Gulf Oil Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 17, 1959
100 Ga. App. 323 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)

Opinion

37903.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1959. REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 5, 1959.

Action for damages. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Pharr. July 1, 1959.

Cook, Llop Long, Joseph L. Llop, for plaintiff in error.

Greene, Neely, Buckley DeRieux, John D. Jones, for Gulf Oil Corporation.

Nall, Miller, Cadenhead Dennis, B. Carl Buice, for Broadview Plaza, Inc.

Marvin G. Russell, Turner Paschal, for Roy Price.


1. Mere knowledge by the owner or operator of a commercial establishment that one means of access to its premises has been blocked, the obstacle being placed on the property of another at the entrance of a common way connecting the two places of business, which way belongs to the other property owner and over which the owner and operator of the commercial establishment has a mere easement of passage, together with failure of the owner and operator of the commercial establishment to remove the obstacle so placed an undetermined period of time prior to the plaintiff's injuries caused by the latter's collision with the obstacle, or failure of such owner or operator to give warning does not constitute actionable negligence on the part of such owner and operator.

2. A corporation doing business as a shopping center whose premises are open to the general public owes to the members of such public the duty of ordinary care not to injure them in places where they are invited or their presence is reasonably to be anticipated. The petition here alleges facts sufficient, as against general demurrer, to state a cause of action for injuries received by reason of such defendant stretching a rope across a passageway in such an inconspicuous manner as to cause a trap and dangerous condition, by reason of which a member of such public lawfully upon such premises sustained injuries.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1959 — REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 5, 1959.


Gilbert D. Spindel, Jr., a minor 12 years of age, filed an action in the Superior Court of Fulton County for damages resulting from personal injuries against Broadview, Inc. (designated Broadview Plaza, Inc.), Gulf Oil Corporation, Roy Price d/b/a Broadview Plaza Gulf Service, and E. G. Fitzgerald. The petition alleges that Broadview Plaza, Inc., owns a tract of land of 46 acres in the city of Atlanta which has been developed as a shopping center; that on August 31, 1958, a Sunday, the premises were open to the general public; that on the southwest corner of the property there is a common right-of-way on the property of Broadview Plaza, Inc., leading to a service station owned by Gulf Oil Corporation and operated by the defendant Price, which way "is also used by the general public to obtain entrance to defendant Gulf Oil Corporation's leased service station operated by defendant Price," is about 20 feet in width, and is used as a common way by the two corporate defendants and Price; that Fitzgerald, a servant and agent of Broadview Plaza, Inc., erected an obstacle "preventing entrance into said right-of-way" by placing a rope extending across the right-of-way about four feet from the ground; that the plaintiff rode his bicycle into the rope and was thrown to the ground, sustaining described injuries; that none of the defendants warned the plaintiff of the hazard, and that Gulf Oil Corporation and Price, after knowledge of the existence of the rope, allowed the same to remain. General demurrers of Price and each of the corporate defendants were sustained, and these judgments are assigned as error.


1. Pleadings couched in ambiguous or alternative language will, on demurrer, be given the construction most unfavorable to the pleader. Doyal v. Russell, 183 Ga. 518 (3) ( 189 S.E. 32). So construed, it appears that Broadview Plaza, Inc., was the owner of the premises generally; that Gulf Oil Corporation was the owner of the service station and Price operated it; that the right-of-way in question was a common way leading to the service station but used both by patrons of the service station and patrons of the shopping center; that it is owned by Broadview Plaza, Inc.; that the service station operators and customers and others having business with it have a right of user of the way; that the rope was placed at the entrance to the way. The legal conclusion to be drawn from these facts is that the defendant Broadview Plaza, Inc., which caused the rope to be erected owns the right-of-way and entrance thereto, and that the service station and its patrons have a right of user thereover, in other words, an easement of passage. The owner of such an easement has qualified rights thereover; if the owner of the fee or a co-user should block the passage he may sue in trespass, but to do so he must show that the obstacle is an improper one, either by reason of its nature, the length of time it was left in place, or like matter. Miller v. Southern Exp. Co., 146 Ga. 173 ( 91 S.E. 24). The rope was placed by an agent of Broadview Plaza, Inc., on the property of Broadview Plaza, Inc., in such manner as to prevent entrance into the right-of-way (also the property of Broadview Plaza, Inc.) leading from its premises to the premises of the service station. This right-of-way is alleged to be "the only route that the plaintiff could have used to reach the gas station from the Plaza owned by defendant Broadview Plaza, Inc." but fails to allege it is the only access to the station; indeed, it appears that it was situated "on the southwest corner of said property", and it is elsewhere stated that the Plaza is bounded on the south by Piedmont Road and on the west by Marion Road, which places the service station on the corner of these two streets, with access to both of them. The barrier was not on the property of the Gulf Oil Corporation. Code § 105-401, which places on the owner or occupier of land the duty to keep his premises and approaches safe for invitees, refers to premises under the control of the owner or occupier, not to premises over which he has a mere easement of passage, and which belong to another. The only negligence alleged against Gulf Oil Corporation and its operator, Price, is that they, knowing the rope was in place, failed to remove it or warn the plaintiff of its presence. Under the circumstances alleged no duty is shown on these defendants to take such action, particularly in the absence of allegations that the station was open for business; that these defendants had knowledge of the plaintiff's approach, or that the rope had been in place for an unreasonable length of time. The petition fails to show that Gulf Oil Corporation or Price breached any duty which they owed to the plaintiff, and it was not error for the trial court to sustain their demurrers to the petition and to dismiss them as party defendants.

2. It is strongly contended by counsel for Broadview Plaza, Inc., that the petition shows on its face that the plaintiff was a mere licensee, for which reason this defendant's only duty was to refrain from wilfully or wantonly injuring him, and that the petition fails to show such a state of facts. Although the petition is deficient in failing to allege, except as a conclusion, facts showing the plaintiff to be an invitee, it does allege that the premises of this defendant were open to the public at the time of his injuries and that he was lawfully and rightfully on the premises at its invitation. It is alleged that the premises comprised a shopping center. Although this court can take judicial notice that the date of the injuries was a Sunday, it will not presume that all of the shopping center was closed for business on that day in the face of the allegation that it was open to the public, since there are businesses, such as drug stores and service stations, which operate on Sunday. The plaintiff fails to allege that the invitation extended to the part of the premises where he was injured (as to which see Piggly Wiggly, Macon, Inc. v. Kelsey, 83 Ga. App. 526, 64 S.E.2d 201) but for the purposes of general demurrer it is not necessary to decide whether he was in fact an invitee or licensee since one owes to any person the duty to exercise ordinary care to avoid injuring him where his presence is either actually known or reasonably to be anticipated. Georgia Power Co. v. Deese, 78 Ga. App. 704 ( 51 S.E.2d 724). It is alleged that the sky was gray and dark at the time, that the rope was of a color similar to the pavement, placed in an inconspicuous manner on an uphill grade, that it blended in color with the pavement, and constituted a trap and dangerous condition. That such allegations are sufficient to state a cause of action based on ordinary negligence as against a general demurrer, see Doby v. W. L. Florence Const. Co., 71 Ga. App. 888 ( 32 S.E.2d 527). The petition is accordingly sufficient to present a jury question, both as to whether it negligently breached any duty which it owed to the plaintiff and whether such negligence, if it existed, was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.

The trial court erred in sustaining the general demurrer of the defendant Broadview, Inc. The trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrers of the defendants Gulf Oil Corp. and Price.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.


Summaries of

Spindel v. Gulf Oil Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 17, 1959
100 Ga. App. 323 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)
Case details for

Spindel v. Gulf Oil Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SPINDEL, by Next Friend v. GULF OIL CORPORATION et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 17, 1959

Citations

100 Ga. App. 323 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)
111 S.E.2d 160

Citing Cases

Todd v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Citing Elmore of Embry Hills v. Porcher, 124 Ga. App. 418 ( 183 S.E.2d 923), plaintiff argues that defendant…

Walton v. UCC X, Inc.

We agree with the trial court that Walton's allegations do not afford a basis for Walton to show that Cedar…