From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiers v. Spiers

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Mar 19, 1948
34 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1948)

Opinion

March 19, 1948

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Aquilino Lopez, Jr., Judge.

Lyle D. Holcomb and Dante B. Fassell, for appellant.

Jack Moore, for appellee.


From a careful consideration of the record this court concludes that the chancellor was too generous to the appellee in fixing alimony payments; so the same are reduced from $50 monthly to $25 monthly until further order of the chancellor, and the decree in other respects is —

Affirmed.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

CHAPMAN and BARNS, JJ., dissent.


It is my view that the facts adduced do not justify a decree for alimony in any amount the eighty year old husband. The record discloses that he now possesses only a small sum of money accumulated over the years to be used to sustain him in his declining years or to pay the costs of burial in the event of death. He has no income whatsoever and his advanced age precludes his earning a livelihood. The wife, on the other hand, sued him for alimony about six months after their marriage and it appears that she enjoys reasonably good health, is now sixty-seven years of age and capable of making her own living.

BARNS, J., concurs.


Summaries of

Spiers v. Spiers

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Mar 19, 1948
34 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1948)
Case details for

Spiers v. Spiers

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS A. SPIERS v. SARAH GLENN SPIERS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Mar 19, 1948

Citations

34 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1948)
34 So. 2d 434

Citing Cases

Zelman v. Metropolitan Dade County

Rather, as we are authorized, particularly in the present unusual situation, cf. Dalia v. Alvarez, 605 So.2d…