From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Third Ave. Transit Corp.

City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County
Oct 2, 1945
185 Misc. 920 (N.Y. City Ct. 1945)

Opinion

October 2, 1945.

Henry M. Hirsch for plaintiff.

James A. Quinn and Addison B. Scoville for defendant.



This defendant operates streetcars on the public highways under a public franchise. In these circumstances it seems to me that it is under a duty to disclose to a passenger, injured while riding in one of its cars as a result of a collision between such car and another vehicle, the identity of the owner of such other vehicle. I have had occasion to express this view before ( Amato v. Third Ave. Transit Corp., N.Y.L.J., May 25, 1945, p. 2002, col. 7). The defendant is therefore directed to attend for examination upon the matters set forth in the notice of motion by an appropriate employee at Special Term, Part II, on October 10, 1945, at 2:00 P.M. and to produce for use pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act such of the books, records and papers referred to in the notice of motion as relate to the subject matter of the examination.


Summaries of

Spencer v. Third Ave. Transit Corp.

City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County
Oct 2, 1945
185 Misc. 920 (N.Y. City Ct. 1945)
Case details for

Spencer v. Third Ave. Transit Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GENEVIEVE SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. THIRD AVENUE TRANSIT CORP., Defendant

Court:City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Oct 2, 1945

Citations

185 Misc. 920 (N.Y. City Ct. 1945)
58 N.Y.S.2d 161

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Kansas City Pub. Serv. v. Cowan

Toletti v. Bidizcki, 173 A. 223. (3) The fact that Interrogatories 3 and 4 call for the names of persons not…