From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Mattis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 27, 2017
No. 16-2044 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-2044

04-27-2017

WILLIAM W. SPENCER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES N. MATTIS, Secretary of Defense, Defendant - Appellee.

Donna Williams Rucker, TULLY RINCKEY, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Charles W. Scarborough, Weili J. Shaw, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:16-cv-00161-PX) Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donna Williams Rucker, TULLY RINCKEY, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Charles W. Scarborough, Weili J. Shaw, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William W. Spencer, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spencer v. Mattis, No. 8:16-cv-00161-PX (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Spencer v. Mattis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 27, 2017
No. 16-2044 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Spencer v. Mattis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM W. SPENCER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES N. MATTIS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 27, 2017

Citations

No. 16-2044 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2017)

Citing Cases

White v. Fed. Emergency, Mgmt. Agency

As the magistrate judge correctly held, "[t]he merits of that decision are not subject to review by this…