From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spence v. North Carolina

U.S.
Jun 17, 1968
392 U.S. 649 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 759, Misc.

Decided June 17, 1968.

Together with No. 1311, Misc., Ellison v. Texas, and No. 1823, Misc., Jackson v. Beto, Corrections Director, both on petitions for writs of certiorari. No. 1311, Misc., is to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, and No. 1823, Misc., to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Certiorari granted; No. 759, Misc., 271 N.C. 23, 155 S.E.2d 802; No. 1311, Misc., 419 S.W.2d 849; and No. 1823, Misc., 388 F.2d 409, vacated and remanded.

Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1311, Misc.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent in No. 759, Misc. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, Hawthorne Phillips and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for respondent in No. 1311, Misc. Mr. Martin, Miss White, and Robert C. Flowers, Douglas H. Chilton, and Mr. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent in No. 1823, Misc.



The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the courts below are vacated and the cases remanded for reconsideration in the light of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 532.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 540.


Summaries of

Spence v. North Carolina

U.S.
Jun 17, 1968
392 U.S. 649 (1968)
Case details for

Spence v. North Carolina

Case Details

Full title:SPENCE ET AL. v . NORTH CAROLINA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 17, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 649 (1968)

Citing Cases

State v. Helms

[1, 2] Bifurcation rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge. Exercise of that discretion is not…

GONZALES v. BETO

This Court on at least three occasions has applied the teachings of Turner: Bowles v. Texas, 5 Cir., 1966,…