Speed v. State

Full title: OFFEYETTE SPEED, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 18, 2019

262 So. 3d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-621

01-18-2019

Offeyette SPEED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.We reverse the imposition of investigative costs for the Seminole County Sheriff's Office in the amount of $156.76 and for the Sanford Police Department in the amount of $250.00, and the cost of prosecution in excess of $100.00 because there was no competent, substantial evidence to support those amounts. See § 938.27(7) – (8), Fla. Stat. (2016). We therefore remand to give the State an opportunity to produce the appropriate documentation. Munoz v. State , 884 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) ; see also Phillips v. State , 942 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

We otherwise affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.