From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sparks v. Sterling Doubleday Enterprises

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2002
300 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Summary

holding as a matter of law that team owed no duty beyond screening seats behind home plate and was not liable to member of high school band hit during batting practice while waiting to participate in pre-game ceremonies on opening day

Summary of this case from Coomer v. Kan. City Royals Baseball Corp.

Opinion

2001-09920

Argued November 25, 2002.

December 16, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), entered October 4, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

George C. Vlachos, P.C., Roslyn Heights, N.Y. (Anita Nissan Yehuda of counsel), for appellants.

Ohrenstein Brown, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Carla Varriale of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when, while in the Shea Stadium stands, he was struck by a baseball hit during batting practice. Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, by furnishing sufficient protective screening behind home plate where the danger of being struck by a baseball is the greatest, the defendant fulfilled its duty of care and cannot be held liable in negligence (see Akins v. Glens Falls City School Dist., 53 N.Y.2d 325; Lynch v. Board of Educ. for Oceanside School Dist., 225 A.D.2d 741). The defendant is not required to be an insurer of the safety of spectators who choose to occupy unprotected areas (see Davidoff v. Metropolitan Baseball Club, 61 N.Y.2d 996, 998). Moreover, that the infant plaintiff was a member of a school marching band invited to participate in opening day ceremonies is of no moment (see Stern v. Madison Sq. Garden Corp., 226 A.D.2d 444). The infant plaintiff was still a spectator who assumed the risk of his injuries (see Honohan v. Turrone, 297 A.D.2d 705).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sparks v. Sterling Doubleday Enterprises

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2002
300 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

holding as a matter of law that team owed no duty beyond screening seats behind home plate and was not liable to member of high school band hit during batting practice while waiting to participate in pre-game ceremonies on opening day

Summary of this case from Coomer v. Kan. City Royals Baseball Corp.

holding as a matter of law that team owed no duty beyond screening seats behind home plate and was not liable to member of high school band hit during batting practice while waiting to participate in pre-game ceremonies on opening day

Summary of this case from Coomer v. Kan. City Royals Baseball Corp.
Case details for

Sparks v. Sterling Doubleday Enterprises

Case Details

Full title:BRENDAN SPARKS, ETC., ET AL., appellants, v. STERLING DOUBLEDAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
752 N.Y.S.2d 79

Citing Cases

Tarantino v. Queens Ballpark Co.

Defendant's duty was merely to make the conditions as safe as they appear to be. Risks of the activity which…

Tarantino v. Queens Ballpark Co.

Moreover, although a plaintiff may remedy defects in a complaint by submitting an affidavit in opposition to…