From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spangler v. Demshock

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Bryson City Division
May 14, 2009
CIVIL NO. 2:09CV18 (W.D.N.C. May. 14, 2009)

Summary

noting that the plaintiff had failed to cite any North Carolina or federal law which holds that service of a subsidiary is service of a parent corporation, and plaintiff would have to show facts to establish that the subsidiary was the alter ego or instrumentality of the parent

Summary of this case from United States v. Bayer A.G.

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:09CV18.

May 14, 2009


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's motion and brief for default judgment as to the Defendants Mary Hannah and the Internal Revenue Service.

Default judgments are entered after a party has been declared in default. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 55. No entry of default appears of record. Nor has Plaintiff shown by affidavit or otherwise that these Defendants have been duly served with the summons and complaint, and that after such service of process, they have failed to plead or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff's complaint herein. It, therefore, appears the motion for default judgment is premature.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Spangler v. Demshock

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Bryson City Division
May 14, 2009
CIVIL NO. 2:09CV18 (W.D.N.C. May. 14, 2009)

noting that the plaintiff had failed to cite any North Carolina or federal law which holds that service of a subsidiary is service of a parent corporation, and plaintiff would have to show facts to establish that the subsidiary was the alter ego or instrumentality of the parent

Summary of this case from United States v. Bayer A.G.
Case details for

Spangler v. Demshock

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT SPANGLER, Plaintiff, v. LYNN DEMSHOCK; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Bryson City Division

Date published: May 14, 2009

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:09CV18 (W.D.N.C. May. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Bayer A.G.

In re Baycol Prods. Litigation, No. MDL NO. 1431, 2003 WL 24229818, at *4 (D. Minn. Dec. 12, 2003) ("Nor has…