From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.P. Vasile Son, Inc. v. Concrete Trans-Mix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1956
1 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

March 14, 1956

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.


Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements and motion granted, with $10 costs. Memorandum: Unless a proposed amended answer is clearly bad or frivolous, its sufficiency is ordinarily not to be determined upon a motion to serve it but remains to be tested upon a motion after it is served or upon a trial. ( Gillette v. Allen, 269 App. Div. 441, 449; Anderson v. New York Central R.R. Co., 284 App. Div. 64.) Here the questions of agency and notice present factual issues not determinable upon the motion. All concur.


Summaries of

S.P. Vasile Son, Inc. v. Concrete Trans-Mix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1956
1 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

S.P. Vasile Son, Inc. v. Concrete Trans-Mix

Case Details

Full title:S.P. VASILE AND SON, INCORPORATED, et al., Respondents, v. CONCRETE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Peritore v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

The motion cannot be denied unless the proposed answer is clearly bad or frivolous. ( Anderson v. New York…

Hasen v. Apsel

The merits of the proposed amendment or its legal sufficiency are not matters with which the court will…