From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sovereign News Company, v. Corrigan

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 7, 1979
610 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1979)

Opinion

Nos. 78-3064 to 78-3066.

Argued October 4, 1979.

Decided December 7, 1979. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 22, 1980.

Timothy J. Armstrong, Asst. Pros. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for John T. Corrigan.

Bernard A. Berkman, Berkman, Gordon, Kancelbaum Levy, Cleveland, Ohio, for Sovereign News Co.

James A. Brogan, Asst. Prosecutor, Gary W. Crim, Dayton, Ohio, for Lee C. Falke.

Thomas V. Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for amicus curiae Atty. Gen. of Ohio.

Jack M. Schulman, Director of Law, City of Cleveland, Donald F. Black, Bruce A. Taylor, Bertsch, Edelman Fludine Co., LPA, Cleveland, Ohio, for Cleveland Police Officers.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; John M. Manos, Judge.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, KEITH, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.


These consolidated appeals are from the decision of the district court reported at 448 F. Supp. 306, rendered October 31, 1977, holding parts of the Ohio obscenity statute, R.C. Ohio §§ 2907.01(F) and 2907.32, to be unconstitutionally overbroad and vague under Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).

On December 7, 1978, the Supreme Court of Ohio rendered an opinion in State of Ohio v. Burgun, 56 Ohio St.2d 354, 384 N.E.2d 255 (1978), holding that the Ohio statute when construed to incorporate the guidelines of Miller v. California, is valid and constitutional. The first syllabus, prepared by the Supreme Court of Ohio, is as follows:

R.C. 2907.01(F), which sets forth the definition of "obscenity," is neither unconstitutionally overbroad nor void for vagueness when it is authoritatively construed to incorporate the guidelines prescribed in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, [ 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419].

56 Ohio St.2d at 354, 384 N.E.2d at 255.

Upon consideration of the briefs, oral arguments of counsel and the entire record, it is ORDERED that these cases be remanded to the district court for further consideration in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio in State of Ohio v. Burgun.


Summaries of

Sovereign News Company, v. Corrigan

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 7, 1979
610 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1979)
Case details for

Sovereign News Company, v. Corrigan

Case Details

Full title:SOVEREIGN NEWS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOHN T. CORRIGAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 7, 1979

Citations

610 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1979)

Citing Cases

United States v. Tolczeki

Vacated and remanded on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1013, 101 S.Ct. 2998, 69 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) and 456 U.S. 968,…

Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal Court

" Thereafter, the court of appeals remanded the consolidated cases "to the district court for further…