From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southern Railway Company v. Chapman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 18, 1956
235 F.2d 43 (4th Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 7184.

Argued June 8, 1956.

Decided June 18, 1956.

Frank G. Tompkins, Jr., Columbia, S.C. (Moss Moss and James A. Moss, Orangeburg, S.C., on brief), for appellant.

Henry H. Edens, Columbia, S.C. (Marshall B. Williams, Orangeburg, S.C., and Henry Hammer, Columbia, S.C., on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and MOORE, District Judge.


This is an appeal by defendant from an order allowing plaintiff to take a voluntary nonsuit or enter a dismissal without prejudice upon payment of costs in an action commenced to recover damages on account of wrongful death. No counterclaim had been asserted in the action, no depositions had been taken, no interrogatories had been filed and nothing else had been done except that a motion for removal to a district in another state had been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1404. We think it clear that no abuse of discretion was shown in entering the order of dismissal. New York, C. St. L.R. Co. v. Vardaman, 8 Cir., 181 F.2d 769.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Southern Railway Company v. Chapman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 18, 1956
235 F.2d 43 (4th Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Southern Railway Company v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. John A. CHAPMAN, Administrator of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 18, 1956

Citations

235 F.2d 43 (4th Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

Standard National Insurance Company v. Bayless

Under Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. rule 41(a)(2), 28 U.S.C.A., the district judge acted well within his discretion in…

Moore v. Davis

Thus, it is doubtful that the defendants would suffer prejudice from the granting of a Rule 41(a)(2) motion.…