concluding that threats of violence and fighting words are proscribable because government has "valid interest" in protecting citizens both from fear of violence and violence
Summary of this case from O'Mara v. CommonwealthNo. 95-808.
February 26, 1996.
C.A. 9th. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 64 F. 3d 1330.
concluding that threats of violence and fighting words are proscribable because government has "valid interest" in protecting citizens both from fear of violence and violence
Summary of this case from O'Mara v. CommonwealthFull title:SOUTHEASTERN EXPRESS CO. ET AL. v. TRIAD SYSTEMS CORP
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 26, 1996
68. Infringement is a question of fact. Hilton Davis Chem. Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Co., 62 F.3d 1512, 1520…
In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust LitigationBy copying the entire manuals, CCS necessarily copied materials protected under the Copyright Act. See ISO…