From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

South Carolina Department of Revenue v. C&M Market

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 2, 2014
2014-MO-023 (S.C. Jul. 2, 2014)

Opinion

2014-MO-023

07-02-2014

South Carolina Department of Revenue, Respondent, v. C&M Market, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-000126

James Mixon Griffin and Jeffrey Ryan Heiskell, both of Lewis Babcock & Griffin, LLP, of Columbia, for Appellant. Milton Gary Kimpson, Harry T. Cooper, Jr., Kathryn Ray Brown, and Sean Gordon Ryan, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Heard April 3, 2014

Appeal from Richland County Ralph King Anderson, III, Administrative Law Judge No. 2014-MO-023

James Mixon Griffin and Jeffrey Ryan Heiskell, both of Lewis Babcock & Griffin, LLP, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Milton Gary Kimpson, Harry T. Cooper, Jr., Kathryn Ray Brown, and Sean Gordon Ryan, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

The Administrative Law Court's order is affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Ex parte Kenmore Shoe Co., 50 S.C. 140, 147, 27 S.E. 682, 684 (1897) (in rem judgment "bind[s] third persons [and is] conclusive evidence against all the world") (internal citation omitted); MRI at Belfair, LLC v. South Carolina Dep't of Health and Enviro. Control, 394 SC. 567, 716 S.E.2d 111 (Ct. App. 2011) (ALC is fact finder entitled to weigh witness credibility).

AFFIRMED.

TOAL, C.J, PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ, concur


Summaries of

South Carolina Department of Revenue v. C&M Market

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 2, 2014
2014-MO-023 (S.C. Jul. 2, 2014)
Case details for

South Carolina Department of Revenue v. C&M Market

Case Details

Full title:South Carolina Department of Revenue, Respondent, v. C&M Market…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

2014-MO-023 (S.C. Jul. 2, 2014)