From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Lenscraft Optical Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1959
7 N.Y.2d 747 (N.Y. 1959)

Opinion

Submitted October 5, 1959

Decided October 22, 1959

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, BENEDICT D. DINEEN, J.

Harry J. Halperin and Martin H. Schneider for motion and opposed to cross motion.

Murray A. Frank opposed to motion and for cross motion.


Motion to dismiss appeal denied.

Cross motion granted only to the extent of permitting Local 422 to intervene on the appeal, to submit briefs and to participate in the oral argument.


Summaries of

Soto v. Lenscraft Optical Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1959
7 N.Y.2d 747 (N.Y. 1959)
Case details for

Soto v. Lenscraft Optical Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ADOLPHO SOTO et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. LENSCRAFT OPTICAL CORP…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 22, 1959

Citations

7 N.Y.2d 747 (N.Y. 1959)
193 N.Y.S.2d 655
162 N.E.2d 740

Citing Cases

Unitarian Univ. Church v. Shorten

Moreover the argument ignores the wording of CPLR 1012 (subd. [a], par. 2) and would force every potential…

Ryder v. Cue Car Rental, Inc.

(10 Carmody Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 70:69.) Instances in which persons not originally made parties have…