From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorice v. Captree Homes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1998
250 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 18, 1998

Appeal from the an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the injured plaintiff assumed the risks, inherent in the sport of roller-blading, as well as those arising from the open and obvious condition of the road on which he was traveling ( see, Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471; Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432; Steward v. Town of Clarkstown, 224 A.D.2d 405; Kensy v. Village of Southampton, 206 A.D.2d 506).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sorice v. Captree Homes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1998
250 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Sorice v. Captree Homes

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL SORICE, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, DOLORES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 254

Citing Cases

Utkin v. Rademacher

As the egg was launched, the handle slipped out of defendant's hand, striking plaintiff's daughter in the…

Mor v. Yeshiva Yesode Hatorah Nachlals Yakov

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted,…