From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorenson v. Friedman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 5, 2012
10 Civ. 4596 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2012)

Opinion

10 Civ. 4596 (JGK)

04-05-2012

SIGURD A. SORENSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT FRIEDMAN, BERNARD FRIEDMAN, STANLEY WOLFSON, PENMARK REALTY CORP., and 257/117 REALTY LLC, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge;

The plaintiff moves for reconsideration of this Court's decision issued on the record at the hearing held on February 14, 2012, which granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion to dismiss. The plaintiff has failed to show that there were any issues of fact or law that the Court overlooked. While the plaintiff disagrees with the Court's decision, that is not a basis for reconsideration. See, e.g., R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi So, 640 F. Supp. 2d 506, 512-13 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). Indeed, having reviewed the motion for reconsideration, there is nothing in the motion that suggests that the Court's decision was incorrect in any way.

The motion for reconsideration is therefore denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 44.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

April 5, 2012

__________________

John G. Koeltl

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sorenson v. Friedman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 5, 2012
10 Civ. 4596 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Sorenson v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:SIGURD A. SORENSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT FRIEDMAN, BERNARD FRIEDMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 5, 2012

Citations

10 Civ. 4596 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2012)

Citing Cases

Steinberg v. Elkman

Here, "[t]he plaintiff has failed to show that there were any issues of fact or law that the Court…