From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Somerset v. Fondren

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 19, 2009
Civil No. 09-788 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Oct. 19, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-788 (MJD/SRN).

October 19, 2009

Andre R. Somerset, pro se, Federal Correctional Institution — Sandstone, Sandstone, Minnesota.

Frank J. Magill, Jr. and Ana H. Voss, United States Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Respondents.


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED. Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release or Evidentiary Hearing [Doc. No. 12] is argument reiterated from Petitioner's original Section 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition. This motion is DENIED. THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Somerset v. Fondren

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 19, 2009
Civil No. 09-788 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Oct. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Somerset v. Fondren

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE R. SOMERSET, Petitioner, v. DWIGHT L. FONDREN, Warden, FCI Sandstone…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Oct 19, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 09-788 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Oct. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Whentworth v. Fisher

See Kennedy v. Blankenship, 100 F. 3d 640, 643 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that a prisoner does not have a…

Laster v. Wilson

Generally, a habeas petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing only where the relevant facts are in…