From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Beth Israel Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1998
248 A.D.2d 118 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 3, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


Plaintiff's proper recourse for challenging his termination from defendants' residency program is the grievance process set out in Public Health Law § 2801-b, which cannot be avoided "simply by asserting a breach of contract claim", or prima facie tort and defamation claims ( Gelbard v. Genesee Hosp., 87 N.Y.2d 691, 697; Falk v. Anesthesia Assocs., 228 A.D.2d 326, 330, lv dismissed 89 N.Y.2d 916). In any event, as the IAS Court held, plaintiff fails to allege any viable causes of action. We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Solomon v. Beth Israel Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1998
248 A.D.2d 118 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Solomon v. Beth Israel Medical Center

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM SOLOMON, Appellant, v. BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 118 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 807

Citing Cases

Schaefer v. Brookdale Univ. Hosp. Med. Ctr.

It has been established that "[a] resident physician seeking to have his contract to a hospital residency…

Moallem v. the Jamaica Hospital

There are no contract or by-laws claims separate from the suspension of his privileges. All of plaintiff's…