From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solo v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Mar 5, 2009
MDL DOCKET NO. 1785, C/A No. 2:06-2716-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2009)

Opinion

MDL DOCKET NO. 1785, C/A No. 2:06-2716-DCN.

March 5, 2009


ORDER


On February 27, 2009, an Order granting Motion to Compel was entered in above-captioned case. On March 3, 2009, plaintiff filed a letter withdrawing the motion to compel.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the order filed on February 27, 2009, is hereby vacated. Plaintiff's motion to compel is rendered moot.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Solo v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Mar 5, 2009
MDL DOCKET NO. 1785, C/A No. 2:06-2716-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Solo v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Azalea Solo, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated in…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division

Date published: Mar 5, 2009

Citations

MDL DOCKET NO. 1785, C/A No. 2:06-2716-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2009)

Citing Cases

Troncone v. Velahos

In addition, a putative class is not appropriate for certification if class membership would "require…

Troncone v. Velahos

" Id. A putative class is not appropriate for certification if class membership would "require fact-intensive…