From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solins v. Klosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1959
8 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

June 22, 1959

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.


In an action for the specific performance of a settlement agreement, and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial before a Special Referee directing the appellant, inter alia, to specifically perform the settlement agreement. The settlement agreement was entered into in open court. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rule 4.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Anders v. Anders, 6 A.D.2d 440.)


Summaries of

Solins v. Klosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1959
8 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Solins v. Klosky

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL SOLINS, Respondent, v. ADELE KLOSKY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1959

Citations

8 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Matter of Dolgin Eldert Corp.

The Israel group concedes that CPLR 2104 is applicable, but that the agreement in chambers is analogous to…

Katz v. Joseph Rae Enterprises, Inc.

rtain stipulation of settlement and (2) restored the action to the Trial Calendar. Order reversed, without…