From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SOCIEDAD ARMADORA v. 5020 LONG TONS, RAW SUGAR

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 31, 1955
223 F.2d 417 (3d Cir. 1955)

Opinion

Nos. 11460, 11463.

Argued May 20, 1955.

Decided May 31, 1955.

Thomas F. Mount, Philadelphia, Pa., (Rawle Henderson, Joseph W. Henderson, Philadelphia, on the brief), for Sociedad Armadora Aristomenis, Panama, S.A.

Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Krusen, Evans Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Isbrandtsen Co.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.


On respondent's appeal No. 11,460, we think that Judge Grim in the district court was sound in his decision that the charge of the Philippine Government amounting to $1 a ton on the sugar involved was a tax and not a charge for wharfage.

The record supports the disallowance of the setoffs urged by respondent for dispatching and for alleged short delivery.

As to the remaining item for damaged cargo and liability for extra stevedoring, there is ample testimony substantiating the conclusion that libellant had used due care. McAllister v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6.

Nor can we under the McAllister decision hold that the disallowance of libellant's claims in No. 11,463 for additional freight, for demurrage at Iloilo and for excess wharfage at Philadelphia was improper.

The decree of the district court, 122 F. Supp. 892, will be affirmed.


Summaries of

SOCIEDAD ARMADORA v. 5020 LONG TONS, RAW SUGAR

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 31, 1955
223 F.2d 417 (3d Cir. 1955)
Case details for

SOCIEDAD ARMADORA v. 5020 LONG TONS, RAW SUGAR

Case Details

Full title:SOCIEDAD ARMADORA ARISTOMENIS PANAMA, S.A., Appellant in No. 11460. v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 31, 1955

Citations

223 F.2d 417 (3d Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

National Sugar Refining Company v. Motorship Las Villas

This faulty design, which caused the malfunctioning of the valve was a latent defect not discoverable by due…

Liberty Navigation Trading Co. v. Kinoshita Co.

Although this tax is referred to in the statute as a wharfage charge, nevertheless there is authority to…