Summary
Upholding special master's conclusion of law which stated "Plaintiff . . . has failed to prove . . . [t]he amount of its damage from loss of profits it would have made on such additional sales of the patented composition"
Summary of this case from Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc.Opinion
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 580.
Decided February 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 147 Conn. 374, 161 A.2d 770.
Philip Reich for appellants.
James J. O'Connell and Albert L. Coles for appellees.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.