From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SNOW MOUNTAIN PINE CO. v. PUC

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 20, 1990
795 P.2d 611 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

A8812-06809, A8907-03971; CA A62055

Argued and submitted July 6, 1990

Affirmed August 1, 1990 Reconsideration denied October 3, 1990 Petition for review denied November 20, 1990

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

William C. Snouffer, Judge.

Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were Paul E. Levy, Boise, Idaho, and Donald A. Haagensen, David F. Bartz, Jr., and Schwabe, Williamson Wyatt, Portland.

W. Benny Won, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Public Utility Commission. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

John W. Gould, Portland, argued the cause for respondent CP National Corporation. With him on the brief were George L. Wagner and Spears, Lubersky, Bledsoe, Anderson, Young Hilliard, Portland.

Thomas A. Balmer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. With him on the brief were Lindsay, Hart, Neil Weigler, Portland, and Henry C. Lorenzen and Corey, Byler, Rew, Lorenzen Hojem, Pendleton.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Snow Mountain Pine Company appeals from a decision of the circuit court affirming an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) on remand from this court. Snow Mt. Pine Company v. Maudlin, 84 Or. App. 590, 734 P.2d 1366, rev den 303 Or. 591 (1987). It contends that PUC's decision is inconsistent with our remand instructions or, in the alternative, that our opinion and remand instructions were wrong. We adhere to our opinion and conclude that PUC complied with our instructions on remand.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

SNOW MOUNTAIN PINE CO. v. PUC

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 20, 1990
795 P.2d 611 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

SNOW MOUNTAIN PINE CO. v. PUC

Case Details

Full title:SNOW MOUNTAIN PINE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 20, 1990

Citations

795 P.2d 611 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
795 P.2d 611

Citing Cases

Oregon Trail Elec. Consumers Coop., v. Co-Gen

As we previously have described them, cogenerators produce two forms of useful energy, such as electric power…

Snow Mountain Pine Company v. CP National Corp.

Plaintiff asserted several claims and theories, but their common theme is that defendant unlawfully refused…