From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snodgrass v. Clark

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2015
600 F. App'x 891 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-7671

04-22-2015

KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC; GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director; R. MATHENA, Warden; JOHN WALRATH, Assistant Warden; SHORTRIDGE, Operations Officer; J. GALLIHAR, Major; J. MCQUEEN, Investigator; CCS, Central Classification Services; SWINNEY, Unit Manager; KILBOURNE, Unit Manager; SERGEANT HALL, Sergeant; SERGEANT INGLE; L. T. MULLINS, Lieutenant; PAYNE, Lieutenant; J. MESSER, Grievance Coordinator; R. MULLINS, Grievance Coordinator; J. OWENS, Property; VANOVER, Property; I.H.O. L. MULLINS, Hearings Officer; SERGEANT SYKES, Sergeant; C/O R. BROWN; C/O VANOVER; C/O CARTER; C/O MESSER; C/O OFFICER MESSER; C/O SHEPPARD; C/O DUPIE; C/O SLUSS; C/O AKERS; C/O GIBSON; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; L. T. LAMBERT, Lieutenant; LIEUTENANT BLEVINS; LIEUTENANT LYLE; SERGEANT HILL; YOUNCE, Unit Manager; SERGEANT BARTON; SERGEANT MILLER, Defendants - Appellees.

Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:14-cv-00257-GEC) Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., appeals the district court's orders (1) dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration and appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Snodgrass v. Clark, No. 7:14-cv-00257-GEC (W.D. Va. July 1 & Aug. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Snodgrass v. Clark

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2015
600 F. App'x 891 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Snodgrass v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and UHURU SEKOU…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 22, 2015

Citations

600 F. App'x 891 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Holmes

Charges A and B were pertinent in view of the circumstances of the case and of the oral charge of the court.…

Harden v. Barbaree

It is necessary for bills in equity to have such degree of certainty that defendant may be distinctly…