From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sniper v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 5, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Viewing the trial record in the light most favorable to plaintiff (see, Meizlik v. Benderson Dev. Co., 51 A.D.2d 676), we find that the jury's verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493), and that the amount awarded to plaintiff for damages did not deviate materially from what would be considered reasonable compensation for his injuries and loss of earnings (CPLR 5501 [c]). We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Sniper v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Sniper v. City of Syracuse

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES N. SNIPER, JR., Respondent, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 372

Citing Cases

Clover/Allen's Creek Neighborhood Ass'n, LLC v. M & F, LLC

Whether the subject parcel became a park under the implied dedication method is to be determined from the…