From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snead v. Ansley

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 15, 2015
160 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D14–2846.

2015-04-15

Derick SNEAD, Appellant, v. Deborah ANSLEY, Appellee.

Derick Snead, pro se, Appellant. Deborah Ansley, pro se, Appellee.


An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Mark H. Mahon, Judge.
Derick Snead, pro se, Appellant. Deborah Ansley, pro se, Appellee.

The trial court erred in granting appellee's petition for protection against repeat violence because appellant was not given a full opportunity to present evidence in opposition to the petition. Accordingly, we reverse the injunction and remand for a new hearing on the petition.

REVERSED and REMANDED. RAY and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

MARSTILLER, J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Snead v. Ansley

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 15, 2015
160 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Snead v. Ansley

Case Details

Full title:DERICK SNEAD, Appellant, v. DEBORAH ANSLEY, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 15, 2015

Citations

160 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Parise v. Selph

We conclude that Mr. Parise was not afforded the due process associated with a full hearing, and therefore…