Opinion
(14632)
Decided October 30, 1992
The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 28 [AC 10431], is granted, limited to the following question:
"In acting on a subdivision proposal that conforms to applicable zoning regulations, may a planning and zoning commission take into account the fact that the property is located in a historic district and that the development of the property may be inconsistent with historic preservation of the district?"
James W. Macauley, assistant town attorney, in support of the petition.
E. Don Smith, pro se, and Eileen Smith, pro se, in opposition.