From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Zant

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 2, 1989
873 F.2d 253 (11th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-8436.

May 2, 1989.

Stephen H. Glickman, Auckerman, Spaeder, Goldstein, Taylor Kolker, Washington, D.C., and Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant, cross-appellee.

Dennis R. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee, cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; Duross Fitzpatrick, District Judge.

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.


ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC (Opinion August 26, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 855 F.2d 712)


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of June 5, 1989, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Zant

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 2, 1989
873 F.2d 253 (11th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Smith v. Zant

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ALVIN SMITH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE, v. WALTER ZANT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: May 2, 1989

Citations

873 F.2d 253 (11th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Zant

The Court took this case in banc, which resulted in the panel opinion being vacated. Smith v. Zant, 873 F.2d…

Mathis v. Zant

See Smith v. Zant, 855 F.2d 712 (11th Cir. 1988). The second panel decision was vacated by the en banc court,…