From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Unger

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-15

In the Matter of Titus SMITH, Petitioner, v. David UNGER, as Superintendent of Wyoming Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Titus Smith, Beacon, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.


Titus Smith, Beacon, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, the positive test results and related documentation and the testimony of the correction officer who conducted the tests provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see *907Matter of Curry v. Fischer, 93 A.D.3d 984, 984, 939 N.Y.S.2d 732 [2012];Matter of Smith v. Dubray, 58 A.D.3d 968, 968–969, 871 N.Y.S.2d 758 [2009] ). Although petitioner contends that an incorrect identification number appeared on the documentation containing the positive test results, this discrepancy was adequately explained by the testing officer who testified at the hearing that this was a typographical error and further confirmed that the sample that tested positive for opiates belonged to petitioner, thereby remedying any deficiency ( see Matter of Vargas v. Bezio, 69 A.D.3d 1075, 1075–1076, 892 N.Y.S.2d 661 [2010];Matter of Victor v. Goord, 309 A.D.2d 1026, 1026–1027, 766 N.Y.S.2d 138 [2003] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ROSE, J.P., MALONE JR., KAVANAGH, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Unger

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Unger

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Titus SMITH, Petitioner, v. David UNGER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7739
953 N.Y.S.2d 906

Citing Cases

Staine v. Fischer

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of all charges. That determination was…

Monje v. Geoghegan

We confirm. The misbehavior report and positive test results, together with the testimony adduced at the…