From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State ex Rel. Dept. of Transp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 7, 1994
1994 OK 61 (Okla. 1994)

Opinion

No. 75807.

June 7, 1994.

On Certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Division 2.

Plaintiff/appellant filed a claim for death benefits in the Workers' Compensation Court and filed this action for damages caused by the wrongful death of her husband. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the State, concluding that the State was immune from liability by 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155[ 51-155](14). The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Certiorari Previously Granted; Court of Appeals Opinion Vacated; Trial Court Affirmed.

Paul E. Quigley, Derryberry, Quigley, Parrish, Solomon and Blankenship, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Julie Jones Corley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.


The issues raised on certiorari are whether the opinion of the Court of Appeals herein, interpreting 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155[ 51-155](14), conflicts with prior decisional law and violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We conclude that the issues presented are governed by Childs v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma State University, 848 P.2d 571 (Okla. 1993). We hold that 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155[ 51-155](14) grants sovereign immunity to the appellee State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation from liability to the appellant Joella Smith, personal representative of the estate of Vestil Leon Smith, deceased, as a third-party tortfeasor for the wrongful death of Vestil Leon Smith.

The material facts are undisputed. On January 25, 1989, while acting within the scope of his employment, Vestil Leon Smith was fatally injured when he lost control of his tractor-trailer on State Highway 31. In April of 1989, Smith's surviving spouse, Joella Smith (appellant), filed a workers' compensation claim for death benefits. In August of 1989, appellant filed this action for wrongful death against the State, alleging that the Department of Transportation had knowledge of the unsafe conditions of Highway 31 and that the Department failed to correct the conditions and/or to give warning of the conditions. By motion for summary judgment, the State asserted that it was immune from liability by 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155[ 51-155](14). The trial court granted summary judgment and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Because of our subsequent opinion in Childs, the Court of Appeals opinion, released for publication, is vacated. However, we note that, consistent with Childs, the Court of Appeals determined the 1988 version of § 155(14), plainly and without ambiguity, provides governmental immunity from tort claims by both state and nonstate employees where those claims are covered by workers' compensation laws and the grant of sovereign immunity in § 155(14) is not constitutionally infirmed.

Childs v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma State University was pronounced subsequent to our granting certiorari herein. Childs considered the application of § 155(14) to a claim for wrongful death of a Texas resident fatally injured while acting in the course of his employment. Upon review of our opinions in Jarvis v. City of Stillwater, 669 P.2d 1108 (Okla. 1983), and Huff v. State, 764 P.2d 183 (Okla. 1988), Childs concluded that the 1988 amendment to § 155(14) "clearly demonstrates an intent to extend the State's Subdiv. 14 immunity to embrace claims by all nongovernmental employees covered for the injurious event by the workers' compensation regime of any state." Childs further concluded that § 155(14) passes constitutional muster in that it does not unduly burden interstate commerce, it does not violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and it does not violate the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. Childs is dispositive of this appeal.

Jarvis and Huff concluded that pre-1988 versions of § 155(14) provided governmental immunity against claims by governmental employees covered by workers' compensation laws of this state.

The 1988 version of § 155(14), 1988 Okla. Sess. Laws, ch. 241, § 2, which remains unchanged and is codified at 51 O.S. 1991 § 155[ 51-155](14), provides:
The state or a political subdivision shall not be liable if a loss or claim results from:
14. Any loss to any person covered by any workers' compensation act or any employers' liability act;

Childs, 848 P.2d at 576.

OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS IS VACATED; SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF THE DISTRICT COURT IS AFFIRMED.

All Justices concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State ex Rel. Dept. of Transp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 7, 1994
1994 OK 61 (Okla. 1994)
Case details for

Smith v. State ex Rel. Dept. of Transp

Case Details

Full title:JOELLA SMITH, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF VESTIL LEON…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 7, 1994

Citations

1994 OK 61 (Okla. 1994)
1994 OK 61

Citing Cases

Farley v. City of Claremore

The surviving spouse had received statutory workers' compensation benefits and this Court affirmed the…

Jackson Cnty. Emergency Med. Serv. Dist. v. Kirkland

¶34 In Smith v. State ex rel. Deptartment of Transportation, 1994 OK 61, 875 P.2d 1147, the plaintiff was…