From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 3, 1978
246 S.E.2d 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

55862.

SUBMITTED MAY 2, 1978.

DECIDED JULY 3, 1978.

Drug violation. Walker Superior Court. Before Judge Coker.

Gary B. Andrews, for appellant.

William M. Campbell, District Attorney, Bruce Hinshelwood, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant appeals his conviction for selling phencyclidine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:

1. It was not reversible error to allow the state's expert to testify on direct examination that the substance was in fact phencyclidine, over the objection that this was a matter of opinion rather than fact. The jury was properly charged that the expert's testimony was not binding and that it could give the testimony whatever weight it deemed proper. See Ford Motor Co. v. Hanley, 128 Ga. App. 311 (2) ( 196 S.E.2d 454) (1973). Furthermore, defense counsel procured an admission from the expert on cross examination that his classification of the substance was at least to some extent a matter of judgment, making it very unlikely that the jury considered his testimony unassailable.

2. It was not error to fail to charge on circumstantial evidence in the face of direct evidence that the defendant arranged the sale. See DePalma v. State, 228 Ga. 272 (1) ( 185 S.E.2d 53) (1971).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Smith J., concur.

SUBMITTED MAY 2, 1978 — DECIDED JULY 3, 1978.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 3, 1978
246 S.E.2d 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 3, 1978

Citations

246 S.E.2d 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
246 S.E.2d 515