From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 27, 1992
414 S.E.2d 653 (Ga. 1992)

Opinion

S92A0134.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1992. RECONSIDERATION DENIED MARCH 18, 1992.

Murder, etc. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Gadsden.

C. Jackson Burch, for appellant.

Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, C. A. Benjamin Woolf, Staff Attorney, for appellee.


David Smith shot and killed David Burch with a handgun. He was convicted by a jury of murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and was sentenced to life imprisonment and a term of years.

The homicide occurred on June 29, 1987. Smith was indicted on September 2, 1987. He was found guilty on February 27, 1988, and was sentenced on April 13, 1988. His motion for new trial was filed on May 2, 1988, amended on December 14, 1989, and January 2, 1990, and denied on September 27, 1991. A notice of appeal was filed on October 8, 1991. The appeal was docketed on October 28, 1991, and submitted without oral argument on December 13, 1991.

1. We have reviewed Smith's claims of error. We hold that the evidence is sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.C. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); and there was no error in the trial of the case that warrants a new trial, or other substantial relief.

2. The trial court assessed to Smith costs for the deputy clerk, the bailiffs, the jurors, and the out-of-state subpoenaed witnesses, pursuant to OCGA § 17-11-1. In Walden v. State, 258 Ga. 503 ( 371 S.E.2d 852) (1988), we held that costs for jurors and bailiffs are not taxable to criminal defendants. Hence, the costs assessed to Smith for jurors and bailiffs must be stricken.

OCGA § 17-11-1 provides:

The costs of a prosecution, except the fees of his own witnesses, shall not be demanded of a defendant until after trial and conviction. If convicted, judgment may be entered against the defendant for all costs accruing in the committing and trial courts and by any officer pending the prosecution. The judgment shall be a lien from the date of his arrest on all the property of the defendant. The clerk shall issue an execution on the judgment against the property.

Judgment affirmed with direction. Clarke, C. J., Bell, Hunt, Benham and Fletcher, JJ., concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1992 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MARCH 18, 1992.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 27, 1992
414 S.E.2d 653 (Ga. 1992)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 27, 1992

Citations

414 S.E.2d 653 (Ga. 1992)
262 Ga. 67

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

The record of this case does not show that the witnesses from Oregon were subpoenaed or that the necessary…