From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Nevada
Aug 30, 1982
649 P.2d 1374 (Nev. 1982)

Opinion

No. 13977

August 30, 1982

Appeal from order enforcing property settlement agreement, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Addeliar D. Guy, Judge.

Graves and Potter, Dale H. Haley, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Rogers, Monsey, Woodbury, Brown Berggreen, Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


This is an appeal arising out of the property distribution in a divorce case. On July 12, 1982, respondent filed a document with this court indicating that she wished to waive the filing of an answering brief. On July 15, 1982, we ordered respondent to show cause why we should not treat her waiver as a confession of error. See NRAP 31(c). Respondent has neither filed a brief nor responded to our order to show cause.

Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondent's conduct as a confession of error. E.g., Walport v. Walport, 98 Nev. 301, 646 P.2d 1215 (1982); Rockwell v. Rockwell, 98 Nev. 80, 640 P.2d 1318 (1982).

This case is reversed and remanded to the district court, with instructions to vacate the order of December 16, 1981.


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Nevada
Aug 30, 1982
649 P.2d 1374 (Nev. 1982)
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE H. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. SHARON KAY SMITH, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Aug 30, 1982

Citations

649 P.2d 1374 (Nev. 1982)
649 P.2d 1374

Citing Cases

Smith v. Smith

Due to the action by Les and Sharon's apparent belief that the December 16 order was only an enforcement…

Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Costa

Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondents' conduct as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); see also Smith…