From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Ralph Dinapoli Landscaping, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 20, 2013
111 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-20

In the Matter of Gregory M. SMITH, et al., petitionersrespondents, v. RALPH DINAPOLI LANDSCAPING, INC., doing business as Country Landscaping, appellant, et al., respondent.

Robert J. Zysk, Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant. Edward C. Kesselman, New York, N.Y., for petitioners-respondents.



Summaries of

Smith v. Ralph Dinapoli Landscaping, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 20, 2013
111 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Ralph Dinapoli Landscaping, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Gregory M. SMITH, et al., petitionersrespondents, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 20, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7740
977 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

Kunin v. Guttman

The defendant demonstrated her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. " CPLR 5203(a) gives…

Myrtle 684, LLC v. Tauber

They also argue, alternatively, that they are, respectively, a bona fide purchaser and encumbrancer for value…