From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Puterbaugh

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 23, 1967
419 S.W.2d 594 (Ark. 1967)

Summary

In Puterbaugh v. Smith, 131 Ill. 199, a statute conferring on the circuit court power to punish for contempt any person who refuses to appear before a notary public and give his deposition in obedience to a subpoena issued by such notary was held invalid, since the contempt was directed not against the court but against the notary.

Summary of this case from The People v. White

Opinion

No. 5-4322.

Opinion delivered October 23, 1967

APPEAL ERROR — RULING ON DEMURRER — DECISIONS REVIEWABLE. — An order overruling a demurrer to a counterclaim is not a final appealable order.

Appeal from Dallas Circuit Court, G. B. Colvin Jr., Judge; dismissed.

G. E. Smuggs, for appellant.

L. Weems Trussell, for appellee.


Appellant Solomon Jerome Smith Jr.'s appeal from an order of the trial court overruling his demurrer to a counterclaim filed against him by appellee Billy A. Puterbaugh, in the nature of an action for malicious abuse of process, is dismissed for lack of an appealable order. Coffelt v. Gordon, 238 Ark. 974, 385 S.W.2d 939 (1965).


Summaries of

Smith v. Puterbaugh

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 23, 1967
419 S.W.2d 594 (Ark. 1967)

In Puterbaugh v. Smith, 131 Ill. 199, a statute conferring on the circuit court power to punish for contempt any person who refuses to appear before a notary public and give his deposition in obedience to a subpoena issued by such notary was held invalid, since the contempt was directed not against the court but against the notary.

Summary of this case from The People v. White
Case details for

Smith v. Puterbaugh

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON JEROME SMITH JR. v. BILLY A. PUTERBAUGH

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 23, 1967

Citations

419 S.W.2d 594 (Ark. 1967)
419 S.W.2d 594

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Stewart v. District Court

First Question: "Have the legislative assembly the power to direct the district court upon the conviction of…

Woodward v. Tyng & Co.

The language of JUDGE BURKE already quoted cannot therefore be regarded as authority for the proposition that…