Summary
In Smith v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 201 Pa. 131, 134, 50 A. 829, which was a suit for damages for injuries received in an accident on a bridge which the defendant company, pursuant to a contract between it and a borough, had built and turned over to the borough some five years before the accident, this Court said that "Doubtless [the Railroad Company] was interested to avoid grade crossings, and as an inducement to the borough to vacate the streets it offered to erect and maintain the bridge.
Summary of this case from Hair v. FerenceOpinion
October, 1924.
Present — Hubbs, P.J., Clark, Davis, Sears and Taylor, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.