From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 30, 1958
254 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 12388.

Argued April 14, 1958.

Decided April 30, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Thomas F. Mount, Philadelphia, Pa., T.E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Krusen, Evans Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.


In this appeal a shipowner is seeking indemnity from a stevedoring company to recover for damages paid to an injured employee of the stevedoring company. The injured longshoreman is no longer in the case and the present contest is solely between the shipowner and the company employed to load the ship.

We find no essential difference between this case and our own decision in Hagans v. Farrell Lines, Inc., 3 Cir., 1956, 237 F.2d 477, although a distinction has been urged. Consequently, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 30, 1958
254 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1958)
Case details for

Smith v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.

Case Details

Full title:George SMITH v. PAN-ATLANTIC STEAMSHIP CORPORATION (Defendant and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 30, 1958

Citations

254 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1958)

Citing Cases

Torres Cruz v. Hudson Steamship Company

" (Emphasis supplied) Hagans supra, was followed in Smith v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. (3 Cir. 1958) 254…

Simpson v. Royal Rotterdam Lloyd

There is a contra line of cases. Smith v. Pan-Atlantic S.S. Corp., 254 F.2d 600 (3 Cir. 1958), affirming, 161…